Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article examine l’individualisation des formes d’entrée en union dans une population rurale du Mali, à partir d’une enquête biographique détaillant les procédures matrimoniales (initiative, prestations, médiatisation et formalisation) et à partir d’entretiens qualitatifs. Il relativise l’idée d’un mouvement continu et homogène bâti sur la contestation individuelle des contrôles familiaux. Le mariage a d’abord évolué par réajustements successifs en intégrant les attentes masculines au dispositif formel géré par les aînés. Il connaît une évolution récente plus brutale, marquée par le recul de la formalisation des unions et le désengagement des responsables familiaux de la prospection matrimoniale. Ce tournant est associé à l’essor des migrations féminines qui met à mal le dispositif institutionnel d’encadrement des jeunes. L’individualisation se double d’un mouvement de privatisation des affaires matrimoniales. Le mariage reste un élément important du jeu collectif, mais avec un glissement de paradigme : il était une composante du contrôle intergénérationnel, il devient aujourd’hui un instrument de différenciation sociale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".