MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103795180 · doi:10.1142/s021773230100384x

LARGE CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE ANOMALOUS MAGNETIC MOMENT OF THE MUON IN SUPERSYMMETRIC THEORIES

2001· article· en· W2103795180 on OpenAlexafffund
Mariana Frank

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Physics Letters A · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsAnomalous magnetic dipole momentMuonParticle physicsMinimal Supersymmetric Standard ModelSupersymmetryMagnetic momentStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Theoretical physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show that, in supersymmetric theories beyond the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon can receive large contributions at one-loop level, of [Formula: see text], rather than [Formula: see text]. We evaluate all such contributions and show that, for low supersymmetric masses, they already exceed the value measured by the Brookhaven E821 experiment. These contributions put more stringent mass constraints on the parameters of the model and can distinguish it from the same process in the MSSM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Physics Letters ASame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207