Adaptive output feedback control for robot manipulators using lyapunov-based switching
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the face of large scale parametric uncertainties, the single model (SM)-based classical adaptive control approach demands high observer, controller and adaptation gains in order to achieve good tracking performance. The well known problem of having high-gain based design is that it amplifies the input and output disturbance as well as excites hidden unmodeled dynamics causing poor tracking performance. In this paper, a multi-model based adaptive design is proposed to reduce the level of parametric uncertainty in order to reduce the observer-controller gains. The key idea of this approach is to allow the parameter estimate of the SM-based classical adaptive control design to be reset into a model that best approximates the plant among a finite set of candidate models. For this purpose, we uniformly distribute the compact set of unknown parameters into a finite number of smaller compact subsets. Then we design a family of candidate controllers for each of these smaller compact subsets. The derivative of the Lyapunov function candidate is used as a resetting criterion to identify a candidate model that closely approximates the plant at each instant of time. The proposed method is evaluated on a 2-DOF robot manipulator to demonstrate the effectiveness of the theoretical development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it