MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103805524 · doi:10.1109/iros.2007.4399143

Adaptive motion estimation of a tumbling satellite using laser-vision data with unknown noise characteristics

2007· article· en· W2103805524 on OpenAlexaff
Farhad Aghili, Kourosh Parsa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Satellite Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterEstimatorNoise (video)QuaternionComputer scienceCovarianceCovariance matrixExtended Kalman filterControl theory (sociology)Noise measurementFilter (signal processing)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceComputer visionMathematicsNoise reductionStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A noise-adaptive variant of the Kalman filter is presented for the motion estimation and prediction of a freefalling tumbling satellite as seen from a satellite in a neighboring orbit. A complete dynamics model, including aspects of orbital mechanics, is incorporated for accurate estimation. Moreover, a discrete-time model of the entire system which includes the state-transition matrix and the covariance of process noise are derived effectively in a closed form, which is essential for the real-time implementation of the Kalman filter. We will show that the translational and rotational measurements are coupled and consequently derive the corresponding observation matrix. The statistical characteristics of the measurement noise is formulated by a state-dependent covariance matrix. This model allows additive quaternion noise, while preserving the unit-norm property of the quaternion. The estimator takes the noisy measurements from a laser vision system with unknown and possibly varying statistical noise properties, and subsequently the estimator adaptively estimates the full sates, i.e., the pose and the velocities, in addition to the covariance of the measurement noise and the inertial parameters of the target satellite. Simulations and experiments conducted will demonstrate the quality performance of the adaptive estimator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpace Satellite Systems and ControlFrench-language works237,207