MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103833312 · doi:10.13053/cys-16-2-1384

System-Level Fault Diagnosis with Dynamic Mesh Optimization

2012· article· es· W2103833312 on OpenAlexaff
Rafael Falcón, Márcio de Souza Soares de Almeida, Amiya Nayak, Rafael Bello

Bibliographic record

VenueRedalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceExploitConvergence (economics)Identification (biology)Set (abstract data type)Task (project management)Scheme (mathematics)Distributed computingFault (geology)SoftwareOptimization problemFault detection and isolationAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"The efficient identification of hardware and software faults in parallel and distributed systems still remains a challenge in today's most prolific decentralized environments. System-level fault diagnosis is concerned with the detection of all faulty nodes in a set of hundreds (or even thousands) of interconnected units. This is accomplished by thoroughly examining the collection of outcomes of all tests carried out by the nodes under a particular test model. Such task has non-polynomial complexity and can be posed as a combinatorial optimization problem. In this paper we employ Dynamic Mesh Optimization (DMO) to detect faulty units in diagnosable systems. The proposed method encodes the potential solutions as binary vectors and exploits problem-specific knowledge to cope with infeasible individuals. The empirical analysis confirms that the DMO-based scheme outperforms existing techniques in terms of convergence speed and memory requirements, thus becoming a viable approach for real-time fault diagnosis in large-size systems."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRedalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México)Same topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207