MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103837083 · doi:10.1190/1.3587219

2D waveform tomography applied to long-streamer MCS data from the Scotian Slope

2011· article· en· W2103837083 on OpenAlexaff
Matthias Delescluse, M. R. Nedimović, Keith E. Louden

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyWaveformOffset (computer science)Seafloor spreadingTomographySeismologyGeodesyWavelengthGeophysicsOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Detailed velocity models of the earth's subsurface can be obtained through waveform tomography. The accuracy of the long-wavelength component of such velocity models, which is the background velocity field, is particularly sensitive to modeling low-frequency refracted waves that have long paths through target structures. Thus, field examples primarily have focused on the analysis of long-offset wide-angle data sets collected using autonomous receivers, in which refractions arrive at significantly earlier times than reflections. Modern marine acquisition with long streamers now offers the ability to record refracted waves with high spatial density and uniform source, both in shallow and deep water. We used 2D multichannel seismic (MCS) data acquired with a 9-km-long streamer over the Scotian Slope in water depths of ∼1600 m. The refracted arrivals, although mostly restricted to far-offset receivers, provided sufficient information to successfully invert for a high-resolution background velocity field. Using a frequency-domain acoustic code over frequencies from 8 to 24 Hz on two crossing profiles, we found that the limited refracted waves can constrain the velocity field above the depth of the turning waves (∼1.5 km below seafloor). Several important features were resolved by the waveform velocity model that were not present in the initial traveltime model. In particular, a high-velocity layer at 300 m below the seafloor, interpreted as gas hydrates, was imaged even where a characteristic bottom-simulating reflector was not visible. At 750-m depth, a strong velocity increase of 300 m/s existed beneath a gently dipping reflector along which low-velocity zones, possibly related to gas, were present. Velocity models were highly consistent at the crossing point between the two profiles. The depth extent of the MCS waveform tomography constrained by refractions could be extended by even longer streamers (e.g., 15 km) or by joint inversion with data from ocean-bottom seismographs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207