Nonisothermal Hydrodynamic Modeling of the Flowing Electrolyte Channel in a Flowing Electrolyte–Direct Methanol Fuel Cell
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The performance of a direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) can be significantly reduced by methanol crossover. One method to reduce methanol crossover is to utilize a flowing electrolyte channel. This is known as a flowing electrolyte–direct methanol fuel cell (FE–DMFC). In this study, recommendations for the improvement of the flowing electrolyte channel design and operating conditions are made using previous modeling studies on the fluid dynamics in the porous domain of the flowing electrolyte channel and on the performance of a 1D isothermal FE-DMFC incorporating multiphase flow, in addition to modeling of the nonisothermal effects on the fluid dynamics of the FE-DMFC flowing electrolyte channel. The results of this study indicate that temperature difference between flowing electrolyte inflow and the fuel cell have negligible hydrodynamic implications, except that higher fuel-cell temperatures reduce pressure drop. Reducing porosity and increasing permeability is recommended, with a porosity of around 0.4 and a porous-material microstructure typical dimension around 60–70 μm being potentially suitable values for achieving these goals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it