Athletic, but ambivalent, and in brief: Canadian newspaper coverage of sledge hockey prior to Vancouver 2010
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study analyses the media coverage of sledge hockey in Canadian newspapers prior to the Vancouver Paralympics. Articles on sledge hockey over a period of 10 years were identified through a search of a full-text newspaper database. Quantitatively, there was little coverage (562 articles over the time frame), and very few had depth (63). The overall thematic structure of sledge hockey coverage could be characterized as ‘athletic, yet ambivalent’. The physicality of the game and players' athleticism were highlighted, but there was a heavy explanatory frame, meaning the differences from ‘mainstream’ hockey were stressed. Further, there was some evidence of the supercrip discourse, with attendant aspects of focusing on the disability and the athlete's struggle against it, rather than focusing on the sporting elements. Considering this, the coverage of sledge hockey at the Vancouver 2010 Paralympics can really be considered a precedent in certain ways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it