MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Thymus-Derived Signals Regulate Early T-Cell Development

2005· review· en· W2103879074 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Reviews in Immunology · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProgenitor cellCell biologyBiologyNotch signaling pathwayT cellProgenitorCellular differentiationStem cellBone morphogenetic proteinChemokineCell fate determinationImmunologySignal transductionTranscription factorImmune systemGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

T cells develop in the thymus from uncommitted progenitors under the influence of multiple soluble and membrane-associated factors that regulate the migration, survival, proliferation, and differentiation of progenitor thymocytes. The role of cytokines such as stem cell factor and IL-7 in this process is well established. However, several recent studies have demonstrated an important role for other soluble factors in T-cell development, including WNTs, bone morphogenetic proteins, and Hedgehog proteins. Other studies have clarified how chemokines regulate the migration of progenitor thymocytes at various stages of development. Furthermore, the Notch pathway has emerged as the critical inducer of T-lineage commitment and differentiation, and Notch ligands expressed by the thymic stroma likely provide essential developmental cues throughout early T-cell development. In this review, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of how thymus-derived signals regulate early T-cell development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it