MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The effect of botulinum toxin type A and a variable hip abduction orthosis on gross motor function: a randomized controlled trial

2001· article· en· W2103938520 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Neurology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCerebral palsyRandomized controlled trialPhysical therapyGross Motor Function Classification SystemRhizotomyGross motor skillPhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgeryMotor skill

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hip displacement is the second most common deformity after equinus in children with cerebral palsy (CP), and may result in dislocation, pain, fixed deformity and loss of function. We studied the combined effects of intramuscular injections of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) to the adductors and hamstrings and a variable hip abduction orthosis (SWASH), on gross motor function, hip displacement and progression to surgery, in a randomized clinical trial. Thirty-nine children, with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy, and mean age 3 years + 2 months (range 1 year+7 months--4 years +10 months) entered the trial. Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels were as follows: one child was level II, 11 were level III, 13 were level IV and 14 were level V. After concealed randomization, 20 were allocated to the control group and 19 to the intervention group. Thirty-five children completed the follow up at 1 year. The novel intervention group received up to 4.0 U BOTOX/kg/muscle, 16 U/kg/body weight every 6 months plus the use of a SWASH brace. The control group received clinical best practice comprising physiotherapy but no hip abduction bracing. Both groups showed improvements in total Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) score [mean 6.0% BTX-A group; 6.1% Control; 95% CI -- 6.7, 6.5 (NS)], however, there was no additional treatment effect for the study group. There were similar improvements on GMFM goal scores and GMFM-66 scores, but again no additional treatment effect was observed. Multiple regression of change in total GMFM by GMFCS classification for each group showed greater improvement in the total scores from baseline in the BTX-A/SWASH treated group than the control group. In the first year, nine children (two in the intervention group and seven in the control group) required soft tissue surgery because of progressive hip migration in excess of 40%. A longer-term follow up of a larger cohort may be required to determine the effect of the combined treatment on hip displacement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it