Behavioral Influences on the Physiological Responses of<i>Cancer gracilis,</i>the Graceful Crab, During Hyposaline Exposure
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relationship between the behavioral and physiological responses to hyposaline exposure was investigated in Cancer gracilis, the graceful crab. The status of C. gracilis as an osmoconformer was confirmed. Survival decreased with salinity: the LT(50) in 50% seawater (a practical salinity of 16, or 16 per thousand) was 31.5 +/- 22.7 h and in 25% seawater (a salinity of 8) was 8.0 +/- 0.7 h. When exposed to a salinity gradient, most crabs moved towards the highest salinity. However, in the salinity range of 55% to 65% seawater, they became quiescent. This "closure response" was also evident at low salinities: the mouthparts were tightly closed and animals remained motionless for 2 to 2.5 h. During closure, crabs were able to maintain the salinity of water within the branchial chambers at a level that was about 30% higher than that of the surrounding medium. The closure response was closely linked to a short-term decrease in oxygen uptake. During closure, oxygen within the branchial chamber was rapidly depleted, with oxygen uptake returning to pretreatment levels upon the resumption of activity. In addition to the short-term decrease in oxygen uptake, there was a longer-term bradycardia, which may serve to further reduce diffusive ion loss across the gills. By exhibiting a closure response during acute hyposaline exposure and an avoidance reaction during prolonged or severe hyposaline exposure, C. gracilis is able to use behavior to exploit areas prone to frequent episodes of low salinity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it