MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103967031 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2005.1578334

Exploiting spatial diversity in rate adaptive WLANs with relay infrastructure

2005· article· en· W2103967031 on OpenAlexaff
Aaron So, Ben Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelayComputer networkThroughputRayleigh fadingComputer scienceFadingAntenna diversityWirelessDiversity gainWireless networkWi-FiTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The throughput capacity of a wireless local area network (WLAN) can be improved synergically by 1) the multi-rate capability of modern WLAN equipments and 2) the spatial diversity provided by its relay infrastructure. In this work, we investigate the effect of multi-path fading and opportunistic utilization of a fixed number of immobile relay nodes on the throughput capacity of a rate adaptive WLAN. We develop an analytical framework that computes the throughput capacity of an IEEE 802.11 WLAN with relay infrastructure in the Rayleigh fading environment. We compare the performance of MAC-layer and network-layer relaying. Our results show that up to 200% performance gain can be achieved by an optimal relay infrastructure over a network with no relay. Furthermore, for a wide range of system parameters, optimally placed relay nodes can significantly increase the network throughput capacity

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005.Same topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207