MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103974837 · doi:10.1002/app.27892

Chemical modification of polystyrene by low‐energy (<100 eV) electron irradiation studied by mass spectrometry

2008· article· en· W2103974837 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonPolystyreneDissociation (chemistry)HydrogenAnalytical Chemistry (journal)IrradiationMass spectrometryElectron ionizationMaterials sciencePolymerChemistryElectronAtomic physicsPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryIonization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Dip‐coated thin films of polystyrene were chemically modified (degraded) by low‐energy electron irradiation (0–100 eV). The resulting degradation was studied by mass spectrometry with variable electron energy. In the negative‐ion mode, H − was observed and was associated with two phenomena. The resonant structure at 9.1 ± 0.4 eV was associated with dissociative electron attachment. The energy of the resonance peak agreed with the results obtained for organic molecules. At a higher energy, a monotonic rise of the emission yield was observed and was associated with nonresonant dipolar dissociation. More mass fragments were observed in the positive‐ion mode. The predominant ion was H + at 100 eV of electron irradiation, and alkyl ions were detected at higher masses. Emission thresholds were measured for the most predominant positive ions. The shape of the emission curve showed that there was no resonant process in the formation of these ions. The energy threshold was measured at about 20 eV, and this meant that the carbon structure of the polymer broke with a recombination of the degradation products with hydrogen atoms before the emission occurred. Below 19 eV, there was only hydrogen loss; this implied that the possible degradation mechanisms did not break the general carbon structure of the material, leading to crosslinking. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it