Australian Law Students’ Values: How They Impact on Ethical Behaviour
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a solution for law schools seeking to enhance access to justice in their communities, but with inadequate resources to divert towards fully-fledged clinical legal education (CLE) programs. The solution, it is suggested, is a student lead initiative based on a Canadian model entitled Pro Bono Students Canada (PBSC). Australia boasts a number of excellent educational programs which incorporate a pro bono ethic; however, these are extremely resource intensive and often beyond the reach of law schools grappling with reduced government funding and other budgetary challenges. Confronted with similar resource constraints, Canada has not only recognised the benefits of involving students in access to justice initiatives, but has also taken steps to strategically align them with national pro bono objectives. It is argued that the creation of a Pro Bono Students Australia – a highly visible and formulated pro bono program - would allow both lawyers and law students alike to put the ideals of justice, equity and accessibility into practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it