32P-oligodeoxynucleotide-coated coils to prevent arterial recanalization after embolization.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endovascular treatment of aneurysms with coils, a less invasive alternative to surgery, is too often associated with recurrences. In a canine model, recanalization after coil embolization can be inhibited by in situ beta radiation. METHODS: Radioactive platinum coils were produced by immersion in a (32)P-oligodeoxynucleotide solution. In vitro and in vivo (32)P-oligodeoxynucleotide elution profiles were assessed after incubation or arterial implantation for 14 days or less. Activities within arteries, thrombi, and coils were measured by scintillation counting. Angiographic and pathologic results no more than 12 weeks after standard platinum and radioactive coil embolization of canine maxillary, cervical, and vertebral arteries were compared among 17 animals. RESULTS: Exposure to (32)P-oligodeoxynucleotide solution at 65 degrees C yielded coils with an average activity of 0.3 microCi/cm. Elution profiles in vitro and in vivo showed that 50% of total activities eluted from coils within 24 hours at first, but coil activities then paralleled the natural decay of (32)P. Radioactivity was present in the thrombi and arterial wall throughout the 14-day observation period. Arteries that were embolized with standard coils recanalized at 2 weeks. Implantation of (32)P-oligodeoxynucleotide-coated coils produced total occlusions in 78.6% of arteries throughout the 12-week observation period. Most arteries that were implanted with radioactive coils were filled with fibrous tissue at 3 months. CONCLUSION: Radioactive coils can be produced by using the binding properties of a (32)P-oligodeoxynucleotide to platinum. Use of these coils in an animal model was effective in preventing recanalization. This method could be performed on site to provide coils tailored to each intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".