MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104017197 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2011.5937649

FPGA implementation of a spiking neural network for pattern matching

2011· article· en· W2104017197 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceSynchronization (alternating current)Block (permutation group theory)Process (computing)Computer hardwareArtificial neural networkSpiking neural networkEmbedded systemTask (project management)Computer architectureMatching (statistics)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A field programmable gate array (FPGA) implementation of a hardware spiking neural network is presented. The system is able to realize different signal processing tasks using the synchronization of oscillatory leaky integrate and fire neurons. The use of a bit slice architecture and short, local interconnections make it adaptable to projects of various scales. The system is also designed to efficiently process groups of synchronized neurons. A fully connected network of 648 neurons and 419904 synapses is implemented on a stand-alone Xilinx XC5VSX50T FPGA, processing up to 6M spikes/s. We describe the resource usage for the whole system as well as for each functional block, and illustrate the functioning of the circuit on a simple image recognition task.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207