Vav Proteins in Neutrophils Are Required for FcγR-Mediated Signaling to Rac GTPases and Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate Oxidase Component p40(phox)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phagocytes generate reactive oxygen species, the regulation of which is important in eliminating ingested microbes while limiting tissue damage. Clustering of FcgammaRs results in the activation of Vav proteins, Rho/Rac guanine nucleotide exchange factors, and results in robust superoxide generation through the NADPH oxidase. In this study, studies in neutrophils isolated from mice deficient in Vav or Rac isoforms demonstrate a critical role for Vav3 in Rac2-dependent activation of the NADPH oxidase following FcgammaR clustering. However, studies in cytokine-primed cells revealed a strict requirement for Vav1 and Vav3 and Rac1 and Rac2 in the FcgammaR-mediated oxidative burst. In comparison, Vav was not essential for PMA or G protein-coupled receptor-mediated superoxide generation. The FcgammaR-mediated oxidative burst defect in Vav-deficient cells was linked to aberrant Rac activation as well as Rac- and actin-polymerization-independent, but PI3K-dependent, phosphorylation of the NADPH oxidase component p40(phox). In macrophages, Vav regulation of Rac GTPases was required specifically in FcgammaR-mediated activation of the oxidative burst, but not in phagocytosis. Thus, Vav proteins specifically couple FcgammaR signaling to NADPH oxidase function through a Rac-dependent as well as an unexpected Rac-independent signal that is proximal to NADPH oxidase activation and does not require actin polymerization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".