MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104079056 · doi:10.1145/1950413.1950445

Scalable and deterministic timing-driven parallel placement for FPGAs

2011· article· en· W2104079056 on OpenAlexafffund
Chris C. Wang, Guy Lemieux

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceParallel computingScalabilitySpeedupBounding overwatchMetric (unit)Simulated annealingParallelism (grammar)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a parallel implementation of the timing-driven VPR~5.0 simulated annealing engine. By restricting the move distance to a confined neighborhood, it is possible to consider a large number of non-conflicting moves in parallel and achieve a deterministic result. The full timing-driven algorithm is parallelized, including the detailed timing analysis updates done periodically while placement progresses. The limited move slightly degrades the placement quality, but this is necessary to expose greater degrees of parallelism. The overall bounding box metric degrades about 11% and critical path delay metric degrades about 8% compared to VPR's original algorithm, but we show the amount of degradation is independent of the number of threads. Overall, the parallel implementation scales to a speedup of 123x using 25 threads compared to VPR. With additional tuning effort, we believe the algorithm can be scaled to a larger number of threads, perhaps even run on a GPU, with little additional quality degradation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVLSI and FPGA Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207