Organisation communautaire et abandon scolaire : illustration d’un champ d’intervention
Classification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’abandon scolaire est aujourd’hui au centre des préoccupations d’une diversité d’acteurs québécois. C’est pour enrichir les connaissances en organisation communautaire que cet article propose d’illustrer les dimensions incontournables d’un champ d’intervention qui a pour préoccupations centrales l’abandon et la persévérance scolaires. Parmi les sujets traités, il sera question du contexte historique de la prévention de l’abandon scolaire, de la pertinence de l’organisation communautaire pour faire face à ce problème social, des connaissances scientifiques utiles ainsi que des différentes catégories d’intervenants agissant dans ce domaine en effervescence. Enfin, seront exposés les principes d’intervention locale et régionale du Conseil régional de prévention de l’abandon scolaire du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean (CRÉPAS).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it