POLYPLOID GIANT CELLS PROVIDE A SURVIVAL MECHANISM FOR p53 MUTANT CELLS AFTER DNA DAMAGE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relationships between delayed apoptosis, polyploid 'giant' cells and reproductive survivors were studied in p53-mutated lymphoma cells after DNA damage. Following severe genotoxic insult with irradiation or chemotherapy, cells arrest at the G(2)-M cell cycle check-point for up to 5 days before undergoing a few rounds of aberrant mitoses. The cells then enter endoreduplication cycles resulting in the formation of polyploid giant cells. Subsequently the majority of the giant cells die, providing the main source of delayed apoptosis; however, a small proportion survives. Kinetic analyses show a reciprocal relationship between the polyploid cells and the diploid stem line, with the stem line suppressed during polyploid cell formation and restituted after giant cell disintegration. The restituted cell-line behaves with identical kinetics to the parent line, once re-irradiated. When giant cells are isolated and followed in labelling experiments, the clonogenic survivors appear to arise from these cells. These findings imply that an exchange exists between the endocyclic (polyploid) and mitotic (diploid or tetraploid) populations during the restitution period and that giant cells are not always reproductively dead as previously supposed. We propose that the formation of giant cells and their subsequent complex breakdown and subnuclear reorganization may represent an important response of p53-mutated tumours to DNA damaging agents and provide tumours with a mechanism of repair and resistance to such treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".