Immune and oxidative stress trade-offs in four classes of Ruffs (<i>Philomachus pugnax</i>) with different reproductive strategies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Immunity and resistance to oxidative stress are two mechanistically related aspects of self-maintenance that are usually not studied together in connection to ecological or evolutionary relevant variables. Whereas many studies compare two sexes, here we use Ruffs (Philomachus pugnax (L., 1758)), a species in which males have three alternative reproductive morphs: independents, satellites, and faeders. Previous work suggested that immune function in Ruffs depends on energetic constraints or potential of injuries. Based on their behaviour and life history, the three male morphs and females can be placed on an ordinal scale with independents at one end and females at the other, and these two explanations predict opposite patterns along this continuum. Innate and cell-mediated immunity decreased along this axis from independents to females, supporting a risk-of-injury explanation over the energetic constrains hypothesis. No such pattern was evident for oxidative stress or resistance, and no relationship was detected between immunity and oxidative resistance or stress. Hence, during the breeding season immunity reflected the risk of injury, with faeders located in the immunological continuum between females and other male morphs. Species with alternative reproductive strategies provide particularly useful systems in which to address the evolution and ecology behind physiological mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".