MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104156100 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2005.1557021

Generating diverse pools of Steiner trees for VLSI routing

2006· article· en· W2104156100 on OpenAlexaff
Gary Gréwal, Xiaoping Yu, Ming Xu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSteiner tree problemVery-large-scale integrationRouting (electronic design automation)Computer scienceTree (set theory)InterconnectionIterated functionSet (abstract data type)Spanning treeCombinatoricsAlgorithmMathematicsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global routing is an important and time-consuming step in the VLSI design cycle. The interconnection pattern for each set of pins (net) that must be connected is a Steiner tree, and the primary sub-problem in global routing is to find a pool of dissimilar, low-cost Steiner trees. In this paper, we propose a fast algorithm, called stochastic Shrubbery (SS), for constructing a diverse pool of Steiner trees for routing multi-terminal nets. SS has a worst-case run-time complexity of O(E log V) and produces trees with tree length similar to that produced by the popular batched iterated-1-Steiner (Kahng and G. Robins, 1990) algorithm. Most importantly, the trees produced by SS are highly dissimilar, allowing for numerous routing possibilities for each net

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVLSI and FPGA Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207