MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104165656 · doi:10.1310/f47f-klcn-t3y6-1uyl

Women, Spinal Cord Injury, and Osteoporosis

2001· article· en· W2104165656 on OpenAlexaff
Claire A Weeks

Bibliographic record

VenueTopics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsGF Strong Rehabilitation CentreVancouver Hospital and Health Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteoporosisSpinal cord injuryBone mineralIncidence (geometry)Spinal cordPhysical therapyPopulationPostmenopausal womenPresentation (obstetrics)SurgeryInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

People who are intact neurologically but who are subjected to a prolonged period of immobilization for a variety of reasons are known to sustain significant deterioration of bone mineral density. Able-bodied women are known to lose a considerable portion of their bone mineral density in the early postmenopausal period, and otherwise healthy individuals with spinal cord injury are known to sustain significant bone loss in the part of the skeleton that is rendered non-weight bearing. Although the incidence of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures has been clearly defined in the postmenopausal population, the risks are less clearly defined in the spinal cord-injured population. The purpose of this article is to review literature pertaining to the incidence of osteoporosis, the risk of osteoporotic fractures, and the presentation, prevention, and treatment of these conditions in people with spinal cord injury, with particular focus on women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTopics in Spinal Cord Injury RehabilitationSame topicSpinal Cord Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207