MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104197982 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2005.1577380

Constrained detection for multiple-input multiple-output channels

2005· article· en· W2104197982 on OpenAlex
Tao Cui, Chintha Tellambura, Yue Wu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDetectorMIMOComputer scienceConstant (computer programming)Interference (communication)Control theory (sociology)Noise (video)AlgorithmConstellationTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)PhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a family of constrained detectors for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channels by relaxing the maximum likelihood (ML) detection problem. Real constrained linear detectors and decision feedback detectors are proposed for real constellations by forcing the relaxed solution to be real. Generalized minimum mean-square error and constrained least squares detectors are generalized as MIMO detectors for both constant and non-constant modulus constellations. Using our constrained linear detectors, we propose a new ordering scheme to achieve a tradeoff between interference suppression and noise enhancement. Moreover, we introduce a combined constrained linear and decision feedback detector to mitigate the error propagation in decision feedback. Simulation results show that the combined detectors achieve significant performance gain over V-BLAST detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it