MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104221336 · doi:10.1109/broadcom.2008.80

Versatile, Stationary/Mobile Low-Cost Telecommunication System

2008· article· en· W2104221336 on OpenAlexaff
Dan Busuioc, Safieddin Safavi‐Naeini

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTelecommunicationsLink budgetCommunications satelliteBandwidth (computing)Mobile telephonyPoint-to-pointSatelliteMobile radioEngineeringWirelessAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a low-cost, versatile microstrip antenna to be used for terrestrial to satellite fixed and mobile point to point links at Ku-band. The Ku band has attracted a great deal of attention in North America and Europe due to the available wide bandwidth and the propagation range, which has enabled it to be used for terrestrial and terrestrial-to satellite links. This makes it particularly attractive for short and medium range communications. This link is versatile and can be re-configured on the fly to provide coverage and increasing omni-directional range. The antenna discussed here can be used for satellite-to-earth communications, both from fixed and mobile terminals. One of the useful features are its ease of manufacture which therefore makes it low cost and easy to install in environments where this is a primary driver. Furthermore, the small-size attracts little attention and creates a stealthy package which is durable in extreme weather scenarios. In conjunction with a low-cost front end radio, which is briefly described, this point-to-point telecommunication system can present a high efficiency, ultra-low cost enabling platform for content delivery (Internet, TV, etc.). Comparisons with other research of wide-area, low-cost network coverage was provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207