MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104259276 · doi:10.1109/nafips.2001.943704

Modeling of a drying process using subtractive clustering based system identification

2002· article· en· W2104259276 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisSubtractive colorProcess (computing)Computer scienceDimension (graph theory)Data miningData modelingSet (abstract data type)Data setIdentification (biology)AlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the modeling of an industrial drying process into a three-input one-output first order Sugeno system. An objective system model is identified from input-output data of the system by applying the subtractive clustering algorithm. The input-output data represents process parameters measured during the drying of starch in a jet spouted dryer. Minimum error models are obtained through enumerative search of clustering parameters. A set of checking data is used to verify the model output. The optimal model, as well as its output, is presented. The step size used in the clustering parameter search is varied and its influence on the modeling performance is presented. Models obtained by setting the same cluster radius for all data dimensions and models obtained by setting a cluster radius for each data dimension are computed and their performance is compared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207