A coincidence between a hydrocarbon plasma absorption spectrum and the<i>λ</i>5450 DIB
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<i>Aims. <i/>The aim of this work is to link the broad <i>λ<i/>5450 diffuse interstellar band (DIB) to a laboratory spectrum recorded through expanding acetylene plasma.<i>Methods. <i/>Cavity ring-down direct absorption spectra and astronomical observations of HD 183143 with the HERMES spectrograph on the Mercator Telescope on La Palma and the McKellar spectrograph on the DAO 1.2 m Telescope are compared.<i>Results. <i/>In the 543–547 nm region a broad band is measured with a band maximum at 545 nm and <i>FWHM<i/> of 1.03(0.1) nm coinciding with a well-known diffuse interstellar band at <i>λ<i/>5450 with an <i>FWHM<i/> of 0.953 nm.<i>Conclusions. <i/>A coincidence is found between the laboratory and the two independent observational studies obtained at higher spectral resolution. This result is important, as a match between a laboratory spectrum and a – potentially lifetime broadened – DIB is found. A series of additional experiments were performed in order to unambiguously identify the laboratory carrier of this band, but this was not successful. The laboratory results, however, restrict the carrier to a molecular transient, consisting of carbon and hydrogen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".