MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104285627 · doi:10.1091/mbc.e09-01-0067

Glycosylation Regulates Pannexin Intermixing and Cellular Localization

2009· article· en· W2104285627 on OpenAlexafffund
Silvia Peñuela, Ruchi Bhalla, Kakon Nag, Dale W. Laird

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Biology of the Cell · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPannexinBiologyGlycosylationCell biologyImmunoprecipitationHEK 293 cellsGlycoproteinMannoseIntracellularConnexinBiochemistryGap junctionReceptorGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pannexin family of mammalian proteins, composed of Panx1, Panx2, and Panx3, has been postulated to be a new class of single-membrane channels with functional similarities to connexin gap junction proteins. In this study, immunolabeling and coimmunoprecipitation assays revealed that Panx1 can interact with Panx2 and to a lesser extent, with Panx3 in a glycosylation-dependent manner. Panx2 strongly interacts with the core and high-mannose species of Panx1 but not with Panx3. Biotinylation and dye uptake assays indicated that all three pannexins, as well as the N-glycosylation-defective mutants of Panx1 and Panx3, can traffic to the cell surface and form functional single-membrane channels. Interestingly, Panx2, which is also a glycoprotein and seems to only be glycosylated to a high-mannose form, is more abundant in intracellular compartments, except when coexpressed with Panx1, when its cell surface distribution increases by twofold. Functional assays indicated that the combination of Panx1 and Panx2 results in compromised channel function, whereas coexpressing Panx1 and Panx3 does not affect the incidence of dye uptake in 293T cells. Collectively, these results reveal that the functional state and cellular distribution of mouse pannexins are regulated by their glycosylation status and interactions among pannexin family members.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations193
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Biology of the CellSame topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207