MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104299102 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv157

Familial hypercholesterolaemia in children and adolescents: gaining decades of life by optimizing detection and treatment

2015· review· en· W2104299102 on OpenAlexafffund
Albert Wiegman, Samuel S. Gidding, Gerald F. Watts, M. John Chapman, Henry N. Ginsberg, Marina Cuchel, Leiv Ose, Maurizio Averna, Cathérine Boileau, Jan Borén, Éric Bruckert, Alberico L. Catapano, Joep C. Defesche, Olivier Descamps, Robert A. Hegele, G. Kees Hovingh, Steve E. Humphries, Petri T. Kovanen, Jan Albert Kuivenhoven, L. Masana, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Päivi Pajukanta, Klaus G. Parhofer, Frederick J. Raal, Kausik K. Ray, Raúl D. Santos, Anton F. H. Stalenhoef, Elisabeth Steinhagen- Thiessen, Erik S.G. Stroes, Marja‐Riitta Taskinen, Anne Tybjærg‐Hansen, Olov Wiklund

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNovo Nordisk FondenBritish Heart FoundationRegeneron PharmaceuticalsSanofiKowa CompanyDanoneF. Hoffmann-La RocheValeant Pharmaceuticals InternationalAmgenNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstitutePfizerEuropean Atherosclerosis SocietyAstraZenecaEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsMedicineFamilial hypercholesterolemiaFamily historyLife expectancyPediatricsGenetic testingInternal medicineNewborn screeningCholesterolStatinPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common genetic cause of premature coronary heart disease (CHD). Globally, one baby is born with FH every minute. If diagnosed and treated early in childhood, individuals with FH can have normal life expectancy. This consensus paper aims to improve awareness of the need for early detection and management of FH children. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is diagnosed either on phenotypic criteria, i.e. an elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level plus a family history of elevated LDL-C, premature coronary artery disease and/or genetic diagnosis, or positive genetic testing. Childhood is the optimal period for discrimination between FH and non-FH using LDL-C screening. An LDL-C ≥5 mmol/L (190 mg/dL), or an LDL-C ≥4 mmol/L (160 mg/dL) with family history of premature CHD and/or high baseline cholesterol in one parent, make the phenotypic diagnosis. If a parent has a genetic defect, the LDL-C cut-off for the child is ≥3.5 mmol/L (130 mg/dL). We recommend cascade screening of families using a combined phenotypic and genotypic strategy. In children, testing is recommended from age 5 years, or earlier if homozygous FH is suspected. A healthy lifestyle and statin treatment (from age 8 to 10 years) are the cornerstones of management of heterozygous FH. Target LDL-C is <3.5 mmol/L (130 mg/dL) if >10 years, or ideally 50% reduction from baseline if 8-10 years, especially with very high LDL-C, elevated lipoprotein(a), a family history of premature CHD or other cardiovascular risk factors, balanced against the long-term risk of treatment side effects. Identifying FH early and optimally lowering LDL-C over the lifespan reduces cumulative LDL-C burden and offers health and socioeconomic benefits. To drive policy change for timely detection and management, we call for further studies in the young. Increased awareness, early identification, and optimal treatment from childhood are critical to adding decades of healthy life for children and adolescents with FH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations870
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207