MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104302690 · doi:10.1177/1527476414558492

The Labor of Creativity in Images of Networking Children

2014· article· en· W2104302690 on OpenAlexaff
Melissa Tanti

Bibliographic record

VenueTelevision & New Media · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Feminism, and Media
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthosCreativityCommonsSociologyPower (physics)Variety (cybernetics)PoliticsIdealizationMedia studiesPublic relationsPolitical scienceLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Children’s programming today reveals an alarming trend in the number of storylines involving ’tween and teenage entrepreneurs. From Disney’s songwriting duo Austin and Ally to True Jackson VP’s teen executives, these programs reflect the idealization of creative labor and naturalize the exploitation of the commons that drives biopolitical power in an increasingly immaterial global economy. These shows hyper-realize the contemporary emphasis on futurity by almost entirely doing away with childhood as child newsmakers, fashion designers, web programmers, and professional celebrities struggle each week to balance the stresses of adolescence within the framework of demanding careers. This paper will show the ways a variety of programs airing on Disney and Nickelodeon channels exemplify the conversion of social life to productive time that characterizes the late capitalist ethos and the consequent ramifications for political life, with particular attention paid to the impact of immaterial circuits of production to young women’s developing subjectivities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTelevision & New MediaSame topicGender, Feminism, and MediaFrench-language works237,207