MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104337558 · doi:10.2980/15-2-3065

Biodiversity patterns of terrestrial isopods from two island groups in the Aegean Sea (Greece): Species—area relationship, small island effect, and nestedness

2008· article· en· W2104337558 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcoscience · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundMinistry of National Education and Religious Affairs
KeywordsNestednessSpecies richnessInsular biogeographyBiodiversityGeographyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although almost one third of Aegean islands have an area smaller than 1 km2, very few studies have concentrated on this spatial scale. We investigate biodiversity patterns of terrestrial isopods in 2 island groups (Kalymnos and Astypalaia) of the Aegean Sea, consisting mainly of small islands and characterized by different geological histories, isolation, and species source pools. We focus on the species-area relationship (SPAR), community nestedness and the investigation of the small island effect (SIE) in these island groups. The slopes of the SPARs for terrestrial isopods of the 2 groups are almost identical and place the 2 island groups within the intraprovincial category. The SIE investigated was detected in both island groups, with the Kalymnos group exhibiting a higher upper limit (the island size threshold under which an increase of species number with increase of area in small islands is not observed). Both island groups are highly nested and exhibit similar levels of nestedness. Despite the different geological histories, isolation, and source pools, the 2 island groups exhibit great similarity in all the patterns investigated. The islands studied still “behave” as parts of a continuous land mass, with high numbers of species even on the smallest islands, limited net effects of island size, and a significant contribution of the interrelationship between area and environmental heterogeneity to the total species richness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.138 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it