Long Term Ingestion of Hormonal Contraceptive Agents – The Exogenous Factor for the Increased Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In three different in-vivo studies the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was investigated utilizing the blood of healthy women who use hormonal contraception (HC) and a control group of non-HC users. ROS were quantified by a validated, commercially available photometric kit. In the first study ROS were measured in blood of women from various regions of the Austrian territory. The findings revealed that women using HC had significantly higher ROS levels in the blood (mean 572 + 136 FORT; one FORT unit represents 0,26 mg hydrogen peroxide per litre) than the non-HC group, HC (347 + 80 FORT). In the second study, ROS from female students of pharmacy were measured. The results were similar to the first investigation: 519 + 92 FORT in the group using HC and 331 + 68 FORT in the controlled non-HC group. These outcomes are statistically significant (p
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".