MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2104382763 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010837

V505 Mon -An early-type binary with a disk

2001· article· en· W2104382763 on OpenAlexaff
P. Mayer, D. Chochol, H. Drechsel, R. Lorenz, M. Plavec, Tomas Raja, A. H. Batten

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsDominion Astrophysical Observatory
FundersVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAVNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsSupergiantSpectral lineAstronomySpectroscopyBinary starBinary numberStellar classificationStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New spectra of the eclipsing binary V505 Mon (usually classified as B5 Ib) were obtained in the optical and UV regions. Only spectral lines of one component are visible, with K = 93 km s-1. According to arguments based on the extent of the disk the mass ratio might be about 0.30. The star with the visible spectral lines would then have a mass of 2.3, the other component of 7.7 , i.e. their supergiant nature can be ruled out. The distance to the system appears to be about 1 kpc. Together with published photometric data, the spectroscopy provides clear evidence for the presence of a disk around the secondary component. The profiles of the C ii 1335/6 doublet lines are used to derive the rotational velocity of the disk. The structure of the disk can be characterized by a central ionized zone surrounded by neutral outer parts. Additional matter of cloudy nature has to be present, and both components are embedded in an extended atmosphere. Abundance of carbon was found to be very low. Similarity with some other non-eclipsing binaries is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→