MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104386848 · doi:10.2514/6.2008-4154

Open Channel Flow around Rectangular and Streamlined Cylinders at Incidence

2008· article· en· W2104386848 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Agelin‐Chaab, Jonathan M. Tsikata, Mark F. Tachie

Bibliographic record

Venue38th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpen-channel flowFlow (mathematics)Channel (broadcasting)Computer scienceMechanicsPhysicsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports an experimental study of turbulent flow past a rectangular cylinder and a streamlined cylinder in an open channel at incidence. The water depth in the open channel upstream of the cylinder was maintained at 140 mm. Each cylinder type was mounted vertically at the channel mid-span at four angles of incidence (θ = 0°, 7.5°, 15°, and 30°). For each angle of incidence, the particle image velocimetry technique was used to conduct detailed velocity measurements at various streamwise-spanwise planes around and downstream of the cylinder. From these measurements, iso-contours and profiles of the mean flow and some turbulent quantities were obtained to document the effects of cylinder geometry and angles of incidence on the wake characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue38th Fluid Dynamics Conference and ExhibitSame topicFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207