MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104420421 · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a0995

Eye Position Information on CT Increases the Identification of Acute Ischemic Hypoattenuation

2008· article· en· W2104420421 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vikrant Mahajan, P.T. Minshew, Jane Khoury, Pei Shu, Marium Muzaffar, Todd Abruzzo, James L. Leach, Thomas A. Tomsick

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroradiologistMedicineStroke (engine)RadiologyMiddle cerebral arteryIschemiaCardiologyMagnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is possible that identification of eye deviation may sensitize a scan reader to early brain hypodensity associated with an arterial occlusive process. Our aim was to investigate the value of observing eye deviation on blinded CT identification of early hypoattenuation following ischemic infarct. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two staff and 2 fellow neuroradiologists reviewed 75 brain CT scans obtained within 3 hours of acute ischemia from subjects in the Interventional Management of Stroke Study. Films were reviewed 3 months apart, the first time with tape over the eyes on the images, the second with the eyes visible. Readers were asked if early hypoattenuation in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) distribution or if a hyperattenuated MCA was present. kappa statistics were calculated to determine agreement among the 4 readers and between each of the 2 readings by the same reader, not only for the original interpretation of the blinded study neuroradiologist but also for the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) for each subject assigned by an unblinded expert panel. A generalized estimating equations modeling approach was used to look at the overall effect of including eye information for agreement between interpretations. RESULTS: Eye information availability was associated with improved agreement for detection of early ischemic hypoattenuation not only among the 4 readers but also between the 4 readers and both the blinded study neuroradiologist (P = .02) and the unblinded expert ASPECTS panel. When comparing first and second readings for hypoattenuation, we also noted increased mean values for sensitivity (46.8% first, 56.5% second), specificity (78.2%, 80.2%), positive predictive value (72.0%, 80.7%), negative predictive value (55.5%, 61.0%), and percentage agreement (61.0%, 67.5%). CONCLUSION: Observation of CT eye deviation significantly improves reader identification of acute ischemic hypoattenuation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of NeuroradiologySame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207