MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104421896 · doi:10.1080/00779962.2009.9722175

A review of the genus<i>Phthitia</i>Enderlein (Diptera: Sphaeroceridae: Limosininae) in New Zealand, with the description of two new species.

2009· review· en· W2104421896 on OpenAlexafffund
Stephen A. Marshall, Sabrina C. B. Hall, Simon Hodge

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Zealand Entomologist · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiptera species taxonomy and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsWoodlandGenusHabitatEcologyBiologyKey (lock)Vegetation (pathology)ShoreGeographyCladeCosmopolitan distributionZoologyFisheryPhylogenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phthitia Enderlein, 1938 (Diptera: Sphaeroceridae) is a cosmopolitan genus common throughout New Zealand, where it is often associated with moist, decaying vegetation. New data on species distributions and habitat associations are presented based on the examination of over 2000 specimens of Phthitia collected from the North and South Islands. Descriptions of two new species, Phthitia plesiocercus and Phthitia emarginata, are given along with a dichotomous key to the seven species of Pthitia now known to occur in New Zealand. Both of the newly described species belong to an endemic New Zealand clade. Phthitia plesiocercus appears to be associated with deposits of decomposing freshwater algae and most specimens were taken on or near lake shorelines. Phthitia emarginata was collected exclusively in traps baited with rotted Agaricus mushrooms in woodlands towards the east of the South Island.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Zealand EntomologistSame topicDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorFrench-language works237,207