Percutaneous Autologous Pancreatic Islet Cell Transplantation for Traumatic Pancreatic Injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTEXT: Traumatic pancreatic injury with pancreatic duct disruption is surgically managed with at least a partial pancreatectomy, often leading to poor blood glucose control and the subsequent development of diabetes mellitus. Autologous β-islet cell transplantation may therefore help to preserve pancreatic endocrine function. CASE DESCRIPTION: We describe 3 patients with pancreatic duct disruption from traumatic pancreatic injury who were treated with a partial pancreatectomy followed by autologous β-islet cell transplantation via a percutaneous transhepatic approach. Immediately after trauma, 2 of the 3 patients had difficulty with glucose control that resolved after autologous β-islet cell transplantation. At follow-up, all patients remained normoglycemic. CONCLUSION: In patients requiring partial pancreatectomy after pancreatic trauma, percutaneous transhepatic autologous β-islet cell transplantation should be considered to minimize the risk of development of diabetes mellitus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".