Un enjeu d’amour : des réflexions d’adolescentes sur leurs relations avec les garçons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente l'analyse du point de vue de dix adolescentes usagères du Centre de santé des femmes de la Mauricie sur leurs relations avec les garçons. Ce thème fut étudié par rapport à leur processus contraceptif dans le cadre d'une recherche qualitative visant à sonder l'intégration de la définition féministe du concept d'autonomie chez ces usagères. Les données d'entrevue furent recueillies auprès d'un échantillon typique en début de 1987 et traitées selon une méthode d'analyse de contenu de représentation soit : les co-occurrences associatives. Malgré une image idéalisée de leur partenaire et idyllique de leurs amours, les adolescentes s'interrogent et tentent des démarches d'autonomie, quoique de façon plutôt intuitive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".