MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104543969 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2005.1582867

Adaptive Output Feedback Control of General MIMO Systems Using Multirate Sampling

2006· article· en· W2104543969 on OpenAlex
Ikuro Mizumoto, Satoshi Ohdaira, Makoto Kumon, Z. Iwai, Tongwen Chen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)MIMOComputer scienceConstraint (computer-aided design)Sampling (signal processing)Adaptive controlControl (management)Causality (physics)Output feedbackMathematicsFilter (signal processing)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In adaptive output feedback control based on almost strictly positive real conditions, a technical difficulty arises when the multi-input multi-output (MIMO) system under consideration is non-square, and in particular, has less inputs than outputs. To overcome this, we propose an idea of multirate sampled-data control. That is, a lifted discrete-time system, which has the same number of inputs and outputs and does not give rise to the causality constraint, is made by carefully choosing faster input sampling rates. The output feedback based adaptive control strategy can then be applied to the lifted system under certain conditions. The results reported here are validated on numerical simulations through a cart-crane model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207