MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104551039 · doi:10.1061/41084(364)51

Guide for Seismic Rehabilitation of Concrete Buildings: Summary of Future Changes

2009· article· en· W2104551039 on OpenAlexaff
Halil Sezen, Jeff Dragovich, Wassim M. Ghannoum, Laura N. Lowes, Steven F. Brena, Kenneth J. Elwood

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationConstruction engineeringEngineeringCivil engineeringReinforced concreteConservatismDriver rehabilitationArchitectural engineeringForensic engineeringComputer scienceStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper summarises improvements to the ASCE/SEI 41 concrete provisions considered for implementation in the new ACI 369 Guide for Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Concrete Buildings. The paper is intended to inform the structural engineering community on the approach being taken by ACI 369 to provide engineers with the latest modeling approaches and acceptance criteria for the assessment and rehabilitation of existing concrete buildings. Through the removal of unnecessary conservatism, it is expected that these modifications will make the seismic rehabilitation of concrete buildings more cost effective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteFrench-language works237,207