MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104703114 · doi:10.1109/itherm.2012.6231497

Investigation of capillary properties of copper metal foams by the rate of rise method in the presence of evaporation

2012· article· en· W2104703114 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahmood R. S. Shirazy, Luc G. Fréchette

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Boiling Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCapillary actionEvaporationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)AcetoneRelative permeabilityMaterials scienceChemistryPhysicsThermodynamicsChromatographyComposite materialOrganic chemistryPorosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An experimental study has been done to define the capillary characteristics of a novel a type of copper metal foam which is to be used as a wick in flat heat pipes for electronic cooling. Capillary properties such as permeability (K) and effective pore radius (r <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">eff</sub> ) are critical in defining the capillary limit of heat pipes, because their ratio (K/r <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">eff</sub> ) i s a measure of pumping capacity of the wicking material. Foam strips with porosities of 68%, 75% and 82% are tested by the rate of rise method to measure K and r <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">eff</sub> . Impact of evaporation on the capillary rise has been studied by using acetone as test liquid in an open and a partially saturated ambient to reduce the evaporation rate. It was found out that the rate of evaporation while the liquid is rising is less than the evaporation rate of a saturated sample with stationary liquid. This will allow ignoring the evaporation effect in the mathematical model used to extract K and r <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">eff</sub> . By this simplification, rate of increasing of acetone and water weight with time is measured with a high precision balance and then, by using an appropriate mathematical model, K and r <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">eff</sub> are extracted. Results show that 75% porosity foam has the highest K/r <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">eff</sub> ratio which makes it a suitable candidate for a heat pipe wicking material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat Transfer and Boiling StudiesFrench-language works237,207