U-Pb ages of plutonism, wollastonite formation, and deformation in the central part of the Lac-Saint-Jean anorthosite suite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Lac-Saint-Jean anorthosite suite (LSJAS) is the largest ensemble of plutons in the Grenville Province. Zircons from a pluton in the central part of the LSJAS yield an age of 1140+105 Ma, which accords with existing 11571142 Ma ages determined from the southern part of the LSJAS. The Du Bras granite is a linear pluton emplaced into the dominantly dextral Pipmuacan shear zone (PSZ). The UPb zircon age of 1148 ± 2 Ma for the Du Bras granite confirms earlier proposals that it is a granophyre, formed at greater depths by partial melting of paragneiss by the heat of the crystallizing anorthosite. Parts of the pluton are strongly deformed by the shear zone, and other parts cut the shear zone. This suggests that the pluton dates one phase of movement of the PSZ. The Canton-St-Onge wollastonite deposit was developed in paragneisses preserved within the PSZ. Titanite from this deposit gives an age of 1163 ± 18 Ma, identical within error to that of the Du Bras granite, indicating that this pluton may have provided the skarn fluids. A second plutonic cycle comprises the post-tectonic Astra granite, which stitches the PSZ, and an amazonite-bearing pegmatite dyke. Zircons gave an age of 1028 ± 2 Ma for the Astra granite. The amazonite-bearing dyke only yielded monazite, one fraction of which gave an age similar to that of the Astra granite. Other fractions record the effects of a thermal event at 10201017 Ma that may be related to a widespread magmatic event. The undeformed Venus de Milot syenitic intrusion yields a UPb age of 988 ± 2 Ma. It was emplaced along the northwest-trending Lac Rioux fault, indicating that one phase of movement occurred before 988 Ma. Another strand of the same fault system also cuts the intrusion, showing later reactivation that may have been associated with the formation of the Saguenay Graben.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".