MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104714716 · doi:10.1002/ps.2013

Identification of new limonoids from <i>Swietenia</i> and their biological activity against insects

2010· article· en· W2104714716 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePest Management Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhytochemical compounds biological activities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsLimonoidSpodopteraChemistryStereochemistryCarbon-13 NMROximeInstarBiopesticideProton NMRMelia azedarachLarvaOrganic chemistryTraditional medicineBotanyBiologyBiochemistryMedicinePesticide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Natural limonoids are one group of compounds being studied for their insecticidal properties. To discover new limonoids with better activities, analogs were prepared via acylation and hydrolysis, and bioassayed. RESULTS: Analogs were identified using one- and two-dimensional (COSY, HMQC and HMBC) (1) H and (13) C NMR, IR and MS. 3-O-Isovalerylswietenolide (13) and 3-O-isobutyrylswietenolide (14) showed excellent antifeedant activity, with DC(50) values of 0.19 and 0.009 mg L(-1) respectively, compared with the natural limonoid swietenolide (80.6 mg L(-1) ) against fourth-instar Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) larvae. CONCLUSION: This work shows that limonoid analogs prepared through semi-synthesis can be used as lead compounds for the development of new insecticides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it