MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104733322 · doi:10.1109/robot.2002.1013426

A solution to vicinity problem of obstacles in complete coverage path planning

2003· article· en· W2104733322 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMotion planningWorkspacePath (computing)RobotCover (algebra)Artificial neural networkComputer scienceObstaclePlannerMobile robotArtificial intelligenceEngineeringGeographyComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In real world applications there exist arbitrarily shaped obstacles in the workspace during complete coverage path planning of cleaning robots. A cleaning robot should be able to sweep in a variety of corners and in the vicinity of arbitrarily shaped obstacles in an indoor environment. Consequently, the robot is required not only to effectively avoid the obstacles, but also to delicately cover every area in the vicinity of obstacles. In the paper, a solution to vicinity problem of obstacles in complete coverage path planning is proposed using neural-neighborhood analysis. The path planner is a biologically inspired neural network. The proposed model is capable of planning a real-time path to reasonably cover every area in the vicinity of obstacles. The robot path is autonomously generated through the dynamic neural activity landscape of the neural network and the previous robot location. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is verified through computer simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207