MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104756975 · doi:10.1063/1.2927311

Two-dimensional fifth-order Raman spectroscopy of liquid formamide: Experiment and Theory

2008· article· en· W2104756975 on OpenAlexaff
Y. L. Li, Liangbin Huang, R. J. Dwayne Miller, T. Hasegawa, Yoshitaka Tanimura

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFormamideAnharmonicityIntermolecular forceRaman spectroscopyDiagonalHydrogen bondChemistrySIGNAL (programming language)Chemical physicsComputational chemistryMolecular physicsStatistical physicsPhysicsMoleculeQuantum mechanicsMathematicsComputer scienceOrganic chemistryGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fifth-order two-dimensional (2D) Raman spectrum of liquid formamide has been obtained. The absolute signal levels, qualitative features, as well as quantitative aspects of the 2D spectrum are found to be in good agreement with recent molecular dynamics calculations. The most important singular feature is the relatively strong rephasing signal observed along the diagonal. This finding illustrates the more structured nature of the hydrogen bond network of liquid formamide in comparison with simple liquids as exemplified by CS(2). The theoretical calculations have been extended to include comparisons of different potentials that illustrate the sensitivity of the experiment to the anharmonic motions in the liquid state. The theoretical results point out the key features in the 2D spectrum that probe the essential details in the intermolecular potential. The experiment has been demonstrated to provide new insight into collective effects operating in hydrogen bonded liquids and opens up the exploration of other liquids with this approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207