MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104763323

Apuntes para una Etnopsiquiatría mexicana

2008· article· es· W2104763323 on OpenAlexaff
Wolfgang G. Jilek

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Health and Social Inequalities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Los investigadores en nuestro campo de la psiquiatría transcultural o de la etnopsiquiatría consideran a Sergio Javier Villaseñor Bayardo, psiquiatra y antropólogo, como el mejor calificado para escribir sobre la etnopsiquiatría mexicana. Es un médico mexicano con entrenamiento en postgrado de psiquiatría y de etnología-antropología en instituciones académicas de primer nivel de México y de Francia. Posee la especialidad en psiquiatría por la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, un grado de maestría en toxicología por la Universidad de París V, un doctorado en Antropología Social y Etnología de la famosa Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales de Paris y además, años de estudio y de investigación de campo sobre la cultura y los sistemas curativos de los grupos indígenas mexicanos. A diferencia de otros intelectuales latinoamericanos, Villaseñor Bayardo elige iniciar su excelente carrera en la cité lumière pero regresa a su país natal para servir a México como un profesor e investigador clínico y académico, autor científico y editor. Ha contribuido a mejorar aún más la reputación de su alma mater, la Universidad de Guadalajara y a la de la prestigiada escuela de medicina, de cuyos pioneros de la psiquiatría hace una crónica en su libro: “Voces de la Psiquiatría”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicPublic Health and Social InequalitiesFrench-language works237,207