Structural properties of discs and bulges of early-type galaxies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have used the EFAR sample of galaxies to investigate the light distributions of early-type galaxies. We decompose the two-dimensional light distribution of the galaxies in a flattened spheroidal component with a Sérsic radial light profile and an inclined disc component with an exponential light profile. We show that if we assume that all galaxies can have a spheroidal and a disc component, then the brightest, bulge-dominated elliptical galaxies have a fairly broad distribution in the Sérsic profile shape parameter nB, with a median of approximately 3.7 and with σ∼ 0.9. Other galaxies have smaller nB values. This means that spheroids are in general less concentrated than the de Vaucouleurs R1/4-law profile, which has nB= 4. While the result of our light decomposition is robust, we cannot prove without kinematic information that these components are spheroids and discs, in the usual sense of pressure- and rotation-supported stellar systems. However, we show that the distribution of disc inclination angles is consistent with a random orientation if we take our selection effects into account. If we assume that the detected spheroids and discs are indeed separate components, we can draw the following conclusions: (1) the spheroid and disc scale sizes are correlated; (2) bulge-to-total luminosity ratios, bulge effective radii and bulge nB values are all positively correlated; (3) the bivariate space density distribution of elliptical galaxies in the (luminosity, scale size)-plane is well described by a Schechter luminosity function in the luminosity dimension and a lognormal scale-size distribution at a given luminosity; (4) at the brightest luminosities, the scale size distribution of elliptical galaxies is similar to those of bright spiral galaxies, but extending to brighter magnitudes; at fainter luminosities the scale size distribution of elliptical galaxies peaks at distinctly smaller sizes than the size distribution of spiral galaxies; and (5) bulge components of early-type galaxies are typically a factor of 1.5–2.5 smaller than the discs of spiral galaxies with a slight luminosity dependence, while disc components of early-type galaxies are typically twice as large as the discs of spiral galaxies at all luminosities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".