Disruption of periodontal integrity induces expression of apin by epithelial cell rests of Malassez
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that epithelial cell rests of Malassez (ERM) may express enamel matrix proteins and play an important role in periodontal regeneration. Two novel proteins, apin (APIN) and amelotin (AMTN), produced by maturation-stage ameloblasts and junctional epithelium, have recently been identified. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the ERM express APIN and AMTN under normal conditions and after periodontal challenge. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Gingivectomy and orthodontic tooth movement were carried out on the left side of the maxillae of rats. The control group included the untreated contralateral side of these animals and the maxillae of normal, untreated rats. Animals were sacrificed by intracardiac perfusion on days 3 and 5 after the experimental procedures and maxillary molars were decalcified and processed for paraffin embedding. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate the expression of various ameloblast products, including APIN, AMTN, ameloblastin (AMBN) and amelogenin (AMEL). RESULTS: At 3 and 5 days after periodontal challenge, ERM were more evident in the periodontal ligament along the root surface and in the root furcations. Immunodetection of APIN, but not of the other three proteins, was observed in the ERM following the disruption of periodontal integrity. No immunolabeling for APIN, AMTN, AMBN and AMEL was detected in the ERM under normal conditions. CONCLUSION: The expression of APIN at an early time-point following disruption of periodontal integrity suggests that this protein may be part of the cascade of events leading to the activation of ERM during periodontal healing and regeneration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".