MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104826762 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2003.1562484

ANN-based technique for fault location estimation using TLS-ESPRIT

2006· article· en· W2104826762 on OpenAlexaff
Samar Mohamed, Ehab F. El‐Saadany, T.K. Abdel-Galil, M.M.A. Salama

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFault (geology)WaveformTransient (computer programming)SIGNAL (programming language)ModalArtificial neural networkComputer scienceEngineeringAmplitudeAlgorithmControl theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringVoltageArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a methodology is proposed for identifying the fault location in transmission lines. The required features for the proposed algorithm is extracted from transient currents or voltages waveforms measured at the substation using the total least square-estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance technique (TLS-ESPRIT). Since these transient waveforms are considered as a summation of damped sinusoids, TLS-ESPRIT is used to estimate different signal parameters mainly damping factors, frequencies and amplitudes of different modes contained in the signal. These parameters are functions of the fault location, system damping and fault time. Those features can then be employed for fault location identification. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are used to estimate the fault location using this modal information. Training and testing data are generated using PSCAD/EMTDC simulations. It is crucial to indicate that no pre-fault data is required in this algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems Fault DetectionFrench-language works237,207