MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104831380 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp180

Diabetes, kidney disease and cardiovascular disease patients. Assessing care of complex patients using outpatient testing and visits: additional metrics by which to evaluate health care system functioning

2009· article· en· W2104831380 on OpenAlexafffund
Adeera Levin, Minhal Chaudhry, Ognjenka Djurdjev, M. Beaulieu, Paul Komenda

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaCentre for Advancing Health OutcomesMinistry of HealthUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsMedicineKidney diseaseDiabetes mellitusAmbulatory careEmergency medicineDiseasePharmacyDiagnosis codeCohortMedical diagnosisHealth careOutpatient clinicIntensive care medicineInternal medicineFamily medicinePopulationEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The triad of cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) share many fundamental disease pathways. Patients with these conditions contribute excessively to health care costs. Opportunities for system redesign require metrics by which to evaluate the impact. METHODS: Using a provincial comprehensive set of administrative billing databases (outpatient visits, laboratory tests, pharmacy and hospital inpatient services), we itemized the prevalence of each and combination of conditions, resource utilization associated with each condition and combinations, using ICD 9-10 billing codes and standard definitions. Three consecutive years (2003-2005) were used to establish stability of findings. RESULTS: CKD, CVD and DM diagnoses are found in 422 124 persons within a province of 4.3 million individuals (10%); 1.7% had all three conditions. The median age of each cohort varied significantly between those with multiple conditions (67-79 years) versus those with single condition (56-72 years). The median number of physician visits was 26 per patient year. Duplicate testing accounted for expenditures of $3 million/annum; 7.55% of patients accounted for 34.4% of duplicate tests. Those with DM or CKD had similar use of medications, physician visits and hospital days. Those with all conditions (CVD-CKD-DM) had a median of 6 in-hospital days/year. A significant proportion were not on ACE/ARB or statin medications (30 and 45%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic, complex conditions consume a large number of outpatient and inpatient resources. Documenting these allows identification of a set of metrics by which to design and measure health care system redesign initiatives. Potential targets to benchmark in designing more effective systems have been identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.199

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207